How to Write a Complaint Letter for Norskprøven

In a world where language skills are increasingly valued, the NLS Norwegian Language School stands out with its specialized Norwegian Test Preparation course. Designed for those aspiring to master the Norwegian language, this course is a beacon for learners aiming to conquer the Norskprøven, a pivotal test for proving language proficiency in Norway.

This program is tailored for students at various stages of language mastery, aligning with the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) standards. Pass the Norskprøven with confidence—register at NLS Norwegian Language School now.

Our Norskprøven course includes mock tests to help students prepare and pass.

Navigating the intricacies of standardized language examinations can be a challenging endeavour. The Norskprøven, a mandatory test for demonstrating Norwegian language proficiency for various purposes in Norway, is no exception. While most candidates approach the examination with diligent preparation and a belief in its impartiality, situations may arise where a complaint letter becomes a necessary course of action. This document serves as a guide for individuals who believe they have grounds for formally disputing aspects of their Norskprøven experience or results.

Understanding the Grounds for Complaint

Before embarking on the process of drafting a complaint, it is crucial to establish valid grounds. A complaint must be rooted in observable facts or demonstrable procedural irregularities, rather than mere disappointment with a score. Think of your complaint as a carefully constructed legal argument; it requires evidence and a clear narrative.

Procedural Irregularities

Procedural irregularities refer to deviations from the established rules and guidelines governing the Norskprøven. These are often the strongest basis for a complaint.

Testing Environment Disruptions

Noise and Distractions: Unacceptable levels of noise, such as construction work outside the testing room, frequent interruptions from staff, or excessive chatter from other candidates.
Temperature Extremes: A testing room that is either excessively hot or cold, significantly hindering concentration and performance.
Inadequate Lighting: Poor lighting conditions that strain vision and make it difficult to read test materials.

Technical Malfunctions

Computer Glitches: Issues with the testing software, frozen screens, slow processing times, or unexpected shutdowns during the digital components of the test.
Audio Equipment Failure: Problems with headphones or microphones during the listening and speaking sections, rendering parts of the test unintelligible or making responses difficult to record.
Internet Connectivity Issues: If the test relies on online access and the connection is unstable or fails, impacting the ability to complete sections within the allotted time.

Examiner Conduct

Unprofessional Behaviour: Examiners displaying overt bias, making disparaging remarks, or engaging in behaviour that creates a hostile or unfair testing environment.
Inconsistent Application of Rules: Examiners providing different instructions or allowances to different candidates, or failing to enforce rules consistently (e.g., allowing some candidates more time than others without justification).
Lack of Clarity: Failure to provide clear instructions or answer legitimate questions about the test format or procedures.

Allegations of Unfair Assessment

While subjective elements are inherent in language proficiency assessment, extreme discrepancies or clear errors in marking can form a basis for complaint.

Discrepancies in Marking

Significant Deviation from Expected Score: A score that is dramatically lower than consistent mock test results, previous Norskprøven attempts, or other recognized language examinations, potentially indicating an error in assessment.
Specific Errors in Feedback: If feedback (where provided) contains factual inaccuracies regarding your responses or demonstrates a misunderstanding of your answers.

Misinterpretation of Responses

Speaking Section: The examiner demonstrably failed to understand pronunciation, grammar, or vocabulary due to perceived bias or lack of familiarity with a common accent, resulting in an unfair lower score.
Writing Section: Clear evidence that the written response, despite containing correct grammar and vocabulary for the given CEFR level, was marked down for reasons unrelated to linguistic proficiency (e.g., topic misinterpretation by the marker).

It is important to differentiate between genuine misinterpretation and merely disagreeing with an assessor’s judgement. A complaint in this category requires concrete examples from your performance.

Administrative Errors

Errors in the administration of the test process itself are often straightforward to document.

Incorrect Scheduling or Location

Wrong Test Date/Time: Being informed of an incorrect test date or time, leading to missed opportunities or undue stress.
Incorrect Venue: Receiving conflicting information about the test location, resulting in difficulties in reaching the correct venue.

Errors in Personal Information

Misspelt Name: Incorrect spelling of your name or other personal details on official test documentation or results. This can cause significant issues for official recognition.
Incorrect CEFR Level: Receiving results that mistakenly assign you to the wrong CEFR level, especially if previous communication or preparation clearly indicated a different target level.

Missing or Delayed Results

Results Not Received: Failure to receive test results within the advertised timeframe without adequate explanation.
Incomplete Results: Receiving only partial results when all sections of the test were completed.

Structuring Your Complaint Letter

A well-structured complaint letter is vital. It should be clear, concise, and professional, guiding the reader through your account of events without ambiguity. Think of it as a roadmap for the reader, leading them directly to the heart of your concern.

Formal Salutation and Opening

Recipient Identification: Address the letter to the specific department or individual responsible for complaints regarding the Norskprøven. This information is usually available on the official Norskprøven website or through the test centre.
Your Personal Details: Include your full name, candidate number (if applicable), date of birth, contact information (phone number, email address), and official address.
Test Details: Clearly state the date of the Norskprøven test, the test centre location, and the specific module(s) you are complaining about (e.g., written, oral, listening).

Chronological Account of Events

The Narrative Arc: Present the sequence of events leading to your complaint in chronological order. This helps the reader understand the context and progression of the issue.
Specific Dates and Times: Provide as many specific dates and times as possible for each event. For instance, “On [Date], at approximately [Time], the disruptions began.”
Location Details: Specify where each event occurred (e.g., “in the speaking test room,” “at computer station number 7”).
Involved Parties: Name any staff members or other individuals involved, if known (e.g., “the invigilator, Ms. Jensen”). If you do not know their name, describe them (e.g., “the female invigilator with dark hair”).

Detailed Explanation of the Grievance

The Core Issue: Clearly articulate the specific problem or problems you are complaining about. Leave no room for misinterpretation.
Impact on Performance: Explain how the issue(s) directly affected your ability to perform optimally. For example, “The constant noise from outside made it impossible to concentrate on the listening comprehension section, leading to repeated loss of focus.”
Evidence and Documentation: Refer to any supporting evidence you are attaching. This is the bedrock of your complaint; without it, your claims are simply assertions.

Types of Evidence

Photographs/Videos: If permissible and safe to obtain, photos or videos of the testing environment (e.g., a broken screen, extremely noisy conditions, though be mindful of rules regarding electronic devices).
Email Correspondence: Any emails exchanged with the test centre regarding the test or issues encountered.
Witness Statements: If another candidate or a staff member observed the issue, a written statement from them can be powerful.
Medical Certificates: If a medical condition was exacerbated by testing conditions (e.g., extreme heat affecting an existing health issue, supported by appropriate documentation).
Previous Test Scores: To demonstrate a significant discrepancy in performance that cannot be accounted for by normal variation.
Personal Notes: Any notes you took immediately after the incident, detailing your observations and experiences.

Statement of Desired Outcome

Clarity of Resolution: Clearly state what you expect as a resolution. This could be a re-evaluation of your test, a free re-test, a refund, or a formal apology and assurance of corrective measures.
Realistic Expectations: Ensure your requested resolution is reasonable and proportionate to the grievance. Asking for a full pass without any re-evaluation, for instance, is unlikely to be granted.

Formal Closing

Expression of Trust: A polite closing, such as “I trust you will investigate this matter thoroughly,” or “I look forward to your prompt response.”
Professional Signature: Your full name and signature.

Language and Tone

The manner in which you present your complaint is as important as the content itself. A professional and respectful tone is crucial for ensuring your letter is taken seriously.

Factual and Objective

Avoid Emotional Language: Refrain from using emotionally charged language, hyperbole, or personal attacks. Stick to the facts, presenting them dispassionately. The aim is to inform, not to accuse or vent.
Specific and Concrete: Use precise language. Instead of “the room was too loud,” write “there was persistent drilling noise from adjacent construction work for approximately 35 minutes during the listening comprehension section.”

Concise and Clear

Direct Communication: Get straight to the point. Avoid lengthy introductory paragraphs or tangential information.
Simple Sentence Structure: Use clear, unambiguous sentences. Avoid complex jargon or overly academic language where simpler terms suffice.
Paragraph Breaks: Utilise paragraphs to break up your text, making it easier to read and digest. Each paragraph should ideally focus on a single point or aspect of your complaint.

Respectful and Professional

Polite Demeanor: Maintain a respectful and courteous tone throughout the letter, even when detailing severe issues.
Formal Register: Use formal British English, avoiding slang or colloquialisms. This demonstrates your seriousness and professionalism.
Proofread Carefully: Before sending, thoroughly proofread your letter for any grammatical errors, typos, or awkward phrasing. These can detract from the credibility of your complaint.

Submission Process and Follow-Up

Once your complaint letter is meticulously prepared, the next step involves its formal submission and subsequent follow-up.

Identification of the Correct Authority

Test Centre vs. Central Authority: Determine whether your complaint should be directed to the specific test centre where you took the Norskprøven or to a central examination board or governing body. Official Norskprøven websites provide guidance on their complaints procedure.
Contact Information: Ensure you have the most up-to-date contact information for the relevant complaints department or individual.

Method of Submission

Written Record: Always submit your complaint in writing. Email is often acceptable, but sending a physical letter via registered post provides undeniable proof of delivery.
Proof of Dispatch: If sending via post, retain a copy of the letter and the proof of postage. If by email, keep a copy of the sent email.

Adherence to Deadlines

Timeliness: Be aware of any specified deadlines for submitting complaints. These are often strict and missing them can invalidate your complaint. Act promptly once you identify an issue.
Immediate Action: If an issue arises during the test, notify an invigilator or staff member immediately. This on-the-spot reporting can strengthen your subsequent written complaint.

Keeping Meticulous Records

Correspondence Log: Maintain a detailed log of all communications related to your complaint, including dates, times, names of individuals contacted, and summaries of conversations.
Copies of Documents: Keep copies of your original complaint letter, all supporting evidence, and any responses received. This acts as your personal complaints dossier.

Follow-Up Actions

Reasonable Waiting Period: Allow a reasonable amount of time for a response to your initial complaint (typically 10-20 working days, though this can vary).
Polite Enquiries: If you do not receive a response within the stated timeframe, send a polite follow-up email or letter, referencing your original submission and its date.
Escalation Protocol: Understand the escalation protocol. If your complaint is not resolved to your satisfaction at the initial level, there may be an appeals process or a higher authority to whom you can escalate the matter.

Conclusion: Your Voice in the Assessment Landscape

Crafting a complaint letter for the Norskprøven should be viewed not as a hostile act, but as a formal exercise in seeking fairness and accountability. It is a critical mechanism for you as a candidate to ensure that the rigorous standards of evaluation are consistently applied and that your performance is assessed under optimal and equitable conditions. Just as a compass guides a ship through turbulent waters, a well-formed complaint directs the relevant authorities towards areas requiring scrutiny and potential rectification. By adhering to the principles of clarity, factual accuracy, and professionalism, you maximise the likelihood of a constructive resolution and contribute to the integrity of the Norskprøven process for all candidates.

The NLS Norwegian Language School in Oslo understands that while robust preparation is key, unforeseen circumstances can arise. While our primary focus is on equipping you with the linguistic tools to excel, we also acknowledge the administrative challenges some candidates may face. That’s why our Norwegian Test Preparation course is meticulously designed not only to build your proficiency from various CEFR levels but also to familiarise you with the test format and potential pitfalls. Through intensive instruction and realistic mock tests, we aim to make your Norskprøven journey as smooth as possible. Our expert instructors stay abreast of current Norskprøven regulations, ensuring that our students are well-informed about every aspect of the examination, including avenues for recourse should issues occur. The NLS Norwegian Language School is committed to supporting your success, not just in mastering the language, but also in navigating all aspects of the examination process.